ANTARES adaptive passive heave compensator hanging in the module-handling tower main fall above the moonpool, carrying the coiled-tubing injector platform
Knowledge hub  ·  Well intervention

Coiled-Tubing Heave Compensation:
Holding the Tension Window

Riserless coiled tubing can govern the operation. In this worked example a 2⅜-inch string 400 m long has a 522 kN axial-yield force and can buckle if effective tension is lost — so it has to stay inside a defined tension window while the vessel moves.

String yields at
522 kN
Rigid hang-off demand
1,308 kN
Through the gas
93–146 kN
Slack events
0

Why a riserless coiled-tubing string has to stay inside a defined tension window, what the worked uncompensated case predicts, how the working point shifts when the pipe sticks, and how a project envelope is established.

By Tord Martinsen, CEO · · Reviewed · 5 min read

The string is the governing fragility

400 m of 2⅜″ × 0.190″ CT-90-class tubing has an axial stiffness of EA ≈ 174 MN. Over that length that is 435 kN of tension per metre of stretch — so ±1.5 m of uncompensated relative motion asks the string for ±650 kN, past its 522 kN yield in a single wave.

Ceiling
418 kN
ND worked-example limit set at 80 % of the stated fatigue-corrected yield force; the project string basis governs.
Floor
10 kN
Worked-example effective-tension floor: stripper friction plus a no-compression margin. The project model defines the buckling check.
Subsea stack on the seabed at 400 m with the coiled-tubing string running to surface
The bottom end: 400 m of tubing anchored to the subsea stack. Everything the vessel does at the top has to be absorbed before it reaches here.

What happens with no compensation

Hang the injector platform rigid in Hs 3.0 m / Tp 9.0 s and the string takes the full motion of the ship. The sea asks it for 1,308 kN against a 522 kN yield, and it parts about fifteen seconds into the job. Across twelve wave realisations of that sea state the rigid hang-off parts the string in every one, between 8.7 s and 32.5 s.

Light-well-intervention vessel with the module-handling tower over the moonpool
The modelled case: a 116 m light-well-intervention monohull, the injector platform in the tower main fall, the string through the moonpool.

The worked example as a film — the tension window, the stuck-pipe overpull and the parted-string arrest, rendered frame-for-frame from the CONSTELLATION simulation.

What the compensator has to do

Through one ANTARES 125 t / 5.5 m on its softest charge, the same waves move the tension 93–146 kN about a 118 kN setpoint (roughly ±29 kN) with zero slack events, while the unit absorbs 4.5 m of relative motion.

The mechanism is stiffness, not force: a gas spring soft enough that a metre of ship motion barely changes the pressure, in series with a string that is 435 kN/m stiff. The soft element takes the motion; the string keeps its tension.

ANTARES adaptive passive heave compensator in the tower main fall
One ANTARES 125 t / 5.5 m in the tower main fall, between the winch and the injector platform.

Stuck pipe: the same unit, a different working point

When the tubing sticks, the recovery pull has to rise without the window opening. In this worked example an adaptive passive unit retunes its gas working point in place: the string then carries a 418 kN recovery force (the stated 80 % working line), with wave peaks reaching 89 % of the modelled yield force and no slack event in the twelve realisations. The required setup is case-specific.

Looking up the tower main fall at the compensator carrying the stuck-pipe overpull
Carrying the recovery pull. The unit takes a new working point and keeps following the sea.

The parted string, and why the end of the stroke matters

The accident the industry actually fears is the string parting at maximum overpull. About 418 kN of tension vanishes in a heartbeat and the platform is thrown upward — 3.2 m in about a second on the realisation shown.

Parted-string arrest criteria — the realisation shown, the worst of twelve modelled partings, and the acceptance limit for each.
Parted-string arrestShownWorst of 12Limit
Hard-stop contactnonenonenone
Hard-stop impact speednot reachednot reached≤ 0.5 m/s if reached
Peak deceleration2.1 g3.7 g5.0 g
Main-fall peak0.61 × SWL0.90 × SWL1.00 ×

The compensator must damp the end of its own retraction. With that function the platform is arrested without reaching anything hard. Without it, the same platform on the same wave reaches the end of its travel at speed — a critical failure rather than a controlled stop.

In this worked example, the parting transient governs the main-fall demand rather than the routine suspended-load case. The main fall goes momentarily slack as the platform is thrown up, then catches the load again. Another spread must check every phase and boundary condition against its own load definition and criteria.

Where the envelope closes

The published ensemble establishes the stated response only at Hs 3.0 m, Tp 9.0 s for this vessel, heading, load path and twelve-realisation basis. It does not establish a universal Hs-to-stroke rule or a 3.1–3.4 m operating limit. A project envelope must sweep Hs, Tp, heading and the specified spectrum while checking stroke, tension and the parting transient at every cell.

Frequently asked

Why does coiled tubing need heave compensation?
In the worked case the string is axially stiff and has a defined yield-force ceiling: 435 kN/m over 400 m and 522 kN axial yield. Uncompensated relative motion can therefore move the response outside the required tension band.
What is the tension window?
The project-defined band between the effective-tension floor and working-force ceiling. This example uses 10 kN and 418 kN respectively; neither value transfers without checking the string, pressure, friction, fatigue and operating basis.
Can a passive compensator hold the window in Hs 3 m?
It did in this specific Hs 3.0 m, Tp 9.0 s worked ensemble: 93–146 kN about a 118 kN setpoint, with no slack event in twelve realisations. That is a case result, not a general sea-state rating.
What sizes the main fall on a CT spread?
Check every governing load case. In this example the parting transient governs rather than the routine suspended load; another spread can be governed by a different phase or boundary condition.

Send us your case

String size and grade, water depth, vessel and sea state. We return a worked example like this one — the window through the hold, the overpull case, the parted-string arrest, and the ensemble behind every number.

Talk to an engineer

Related products

  • ANTARES — Adaptive passive heave compensator
  • CONSTELLATION — In-house lift simulation

Related reading

Back to Knowledge Hub