Products / CONSTELLATION · Lift screening

The weather window your lift can actually work in.

CONSTELLATION — our in-house time-domain lift simulator — models your whole operation deck to seabed, then screens it across every sea state to DNV-RP-N103. You get your operating window (Hs×Tp), the governing limit, and what the compensator buys — before anyone mobilises.

Screened to DNV-RP-N103 · ND-DS basis
Modelled, not certified

First-principles, coupled

CONSTELLATION solves the whole operation from first principles — the payload equation of motion with real-gas gas-spring thermodynamics, Morison hydrodynamics, and the splash-zone and landing dynamic-amplification basis per DNV-RP-N103, on our ND-DS modelling basis. It builds the complete load path — crane, vessel, rigging, compensator and payload — as one coupled time-domain model.

  • The complete load path solved as one model — not a static factor
  • Hs×Tp swept gate by gate — a window, not a single number
  • The governing limit named — and by how much margin
  • Fast pre-engineering view — confirmed against your project basis before issue
Modelled, not certified · DNV-RP-N103 / ND-DS
Deck→seabed
One continuous coupled run
Hs × Tp
Every sea state screened
5
Acceptance gates per cell
RP-N103
DNV screening basis + ND-DS
Modelled in CONSTELLATION · representative example

The operating window, screened

Every sea state, gate by gate. The example below is a representative deck-to-seabed install of a ~190 t subsea structure on the ANTARES 250 t adaptive compensator at head sea.

Splash DAF ≤ 2.0 Slack-sling = 0 Landing DAF ≤ 2.5 Touch-down ≤ 0.5 m/s Stroke ≤ 90%
Operability — sea state Hs × Tpworkable region vs cut-off
45678910114.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.5

The cut-off line is the workable Hs boundary — it passes Hs 2.5 m at the design period (Tp 8 s). The ringed design cell is the modelled sea state (Hs 2.0 m).

Hs 2.5 m
Operate up to — at the design period, head sea. The compensator keeps the rigging in tension through the splash and softens the seabed set-down.
~85%
Of the season workable on this representative climatology.
0.53×
Splash snap load vs the DNV gate — rigging stays in tension.
Workable Hs cut-off vs Tp

Long-period governed: the window is widest in short, steep seas and narrows toward the swell.

StandardDNV-RP-N103 · ND-DS-10
Payload~190 t subsea structure
CompensatorANTARES 250 t adaptive
HeadingHead sea
ClimatologyRepresentative winter
Governing limitSplash-zone gates in steep seas; stroke toward the swell

CONSTELLATION results are engineering predictions screened to DNV-RP-N103 and our ND-DS basis on the supplied metocean — not a certified analysis. The operating window is confirmed against project metocean and the contracted vessel before issue.

What we simulate

One continuous run, deck to seabed

One continuous run from deck to seabed — not a static check. The compensator switches gas mode per phase as the load goes overboard and submerges.

Phase 1 — payload rigged on deck1 · ON DECK

Rigged and lifted off; the compensator is locked out.

Phase 2 — splash-zone crossing2 · SPLASH ZONE

Overboard through the wave zone — slam and snap load checked.

Phase 3 — mid-water lowering3 · LOWERING

Mid-water descent through the heave-resonance band; drag and added mass build.

Phase 4 — seabed landing4 · SEABED LANDING

Soft set-down onto the soil reaction.

Acceptance criteria

The gates we check

Each screened sea state must clear every acceptance gate to count as workable.

Splash-zone crossing DAF≤ 2.0DNV-RP-N103
Slack-sling events= 0DNV-RP-N103
Landing DAF≤ 2.5ND-DS-10
Touch-down speed≤ 0.5 m/sND-DS-10
Stroke utilisation≤ 90 %ND-DS-10

Acceptance limits shown are CONSTELLATION screening defaults aligned to DNV-RP-N103 practice and our ND-DS basis — not a project-specific certified limit. For execution we screen against the project’s own DNV basis.

2.5 m
Workable Hs at the design period — the window the screen clears.
0.11 m/s
Modelled seabed touch-down speed, well inside the 0.5 m/s gate.
In tension
Sling stays loaded through the splash — the compensator absorbs the wave force into stroke.
Simulation output · every case run with and without

Run both ways — with, without, and the limit

A screening is a counterfactual, not a clip: the same operation is solved with the compensator and without it, against the governing limit. These are the numbers behind the films further down — every value is the simulation’s own result for the stated case.

CYGNUS · STORM TETHERING

Peak tendon tension — same storm, both ways

Bare tendon2,687 t · 144% SWLWith CYGNUS 1500 t / 8 m983 t · 53% SWLtendon SWL 1,866 t
Snap events 43 → 0Stroke 7.30 of 8 m — stops never touched

TLP tendon pretension · one storm realisation, Hs 4.0 m / Tp 12 s · every peak within SWL

POLARIS · PILE RUN

Hook load — a 1,500 t pile-and-hammer run at 5.0 m/s

Rigid, no absorber (est.)≈45 MN · DAF 3.0 — near breakWith POLARIS 2,000 t / 6 m23.6 MN · DAF 1.43
Force below held on an 18 MN plateauArrested in 5.0 of 6.0 m stroke

Punch-through arrested inside the stroke · rigid-snap figure is an estimate on crane + sling stiffness

CYGNUS · ANCHOR RECOVERY

Peak line load — suction caisson out of firm clay

Bare wire≈2× crane SWLWith CYGNUS 700 t / 5 m566 t · 87% SWLcrane SWL 650 t
Payload ride 3.7× smoother — RMS 0.21 vs 0.80Release rate 0.31 m/s — within the 0.75 m/s limit

Ø6 m caisson, 120 m water · one design sea state, Hs 2.5 m / Tp 8 s · recovered to topside

ANTARES · QUICK LIFT

Minimum deck clearance — lifting off a heaving barge

Conventional cranehits the deck · 7 impactsWith ANTARES 400B quick lift2.53 m · clear first timecriterion ≥ 0.30 m
Re-contact events 0DAF 1.17Stroke 87%

250 t module off a feeder barge, jack-up crane · same sea, Hs 3.5 m / Tp 7.5 s

ANTARES · DECK TO SEABED

Every gate, with margin — one continuous run

Landing DAF 1.00 — gate ≤ 2.540% of gateTouch-down 0.11 m/s — gate ≤ 0.522% of gateStroke 67% — gate ≤ 90%74% of gategate limit = 100%
Snap-load ratio 0.08Criterion met

150 t subsea manifold to 150 m · Hs 3.0 m / Tp 8.0 s · the film runs this case end to end

RIGEL · SPLASH-ZONE CROSSING

Slack-sling check — DNV-RP-N103 §4.4.3.3

Fhyd / Fstatic with RIGEL0.38 — zero slackslack criterion 0.90
Payload DAF 1.10 (ref. static)Sling-group tension held 146–377 kN

GRP cover through the wave zone · the criterion the splash gate enforces on every screened cell

Representative cases modelled in CONSTELLATION and screened to DNV-RP-N103 practice and the ND-DS basis — engineering predictions, not certified analyses. The POLARIS rigid-snap and CYGNUS bare-wire figures are counterfactual baselines for the same realisation.

Application videos · the full series

See CONSTELLATION at work

Each clip is a CONSTELLATION simulation of a real lift case — the same first-principles, coupled model we run to screen your operation. Watch the compensator hold line tension through the sea state.

RIGEL — splash-zone crossing

Passive heave compensation for a GRP cover lift.

ANTARES — deck to seabed

Adaptive passive heave compensation on a subsea lift.

POLARIS — pile-run protection

Shock absorption for offshore pile driving.

ANTARES — quick lift

Lifting off a heaving feeder barge — clear first time.

CYGNUS — anchor recovery

Out of the mud, within SWL — a suction caisson from firm clay.

CYGNUS — storm tethering

Every wave, within SWL — a TLP tendon pretension line through a storm window.

ANTARES — resonance passage

Through resonance, in control — a flooded suction pile past 1,300 m.

Screen your operation

Send your lift case.

Send us the structure, the vessel and the site, and we’ll model the lift and return the operating window, the governing limit and the recommended compensator setup.

CONSTELLATION results are engineering predictions screened to DNV-RP-N103 and our ND-DS basis on the supplied metocean — not a certified analysis. The operating window is confirmed against project metocean and the contracted vessel before issue.

Find the right compensator →
The structure, the vessel and the site — plus anything you already know about sea states and schedule.